WY9 Gingaskin Indian Reservation

WY 9 Gingaskin Indian Reservation
WY 9 Gingaskin Indian Reservation 
Photo credit: Jean E Flynn

Location: Historic Court Green 16404 Courthouse Rd., Eastville, VA 23347

WY 9 GINGASKIN INDIAN RESERVATION


Inscription: The Gingaskin Indian Reservation was located nearby from 1640 to 1813 and was created from a land patent in 1640 that set aside land for the Accomac Indians. When the Accomacs moved there, they became known as the Gingaskins.
They continued to practice their traditional economy of farming, hunting, and fishing. By the 1760s, portions of the reservation had been leased to outside groups to
help support the Gingaskins, who were suffering from a decreased population and pressures from their white neighbors. The legal termination of the tribe began in 1813, essentially against the Gingaskins' will, when their land was divided into plots and deeded to surviving members.

DEPARTMENT OF HISTORIC RESOURCES, 2000


 

Present day Indiantown Park was once part of the Gingaskin Indian Reservation. It is now owned by Northampton County and part of Northampton County Parks and Recreation.



Below is an excerpt from the Northampton250 Trail

Welcome to Indiantown Park
Welcome to Indiantown Park Northampton County Parks and Recreation. Photo credit: Jean E. Flynn 

#7 – Gingaskin Reservation – Indiantown


Indiantown Park
, 7399 Indiantown Rd., Eastville

Enjoy this 52-acre County park that has walking nature trails, a disc golf course, playground, and picnic tables. Bring your binoculars for birding. Porta-potties are by the ballfield. The building is closed.

 
The Accawmacke tribe occupied the southern part of the Eastern Shore, in what is now Northampton County, when the English arrived in 1607. The Occohannocks lived further north, in what is now Accomack County. The leader of the Accawmackes, Esmy Shichan, appointed his brother Kiptopeke to rule as werowance over the Occohannocks. Powhatan's warriors had crossed the Chesapeake Bay in canoes, and Accawmacke were part of his paramount chiefdom. His control over the Accawmacke was not as complete as his control over tribes within the core of Tsenacommacah. In other words, the Eastern Shore was on the "ethnic fringe."

The arrival of the English gave the Accawmackes more freedom from the Powahatan overlords, and, traditionally, the tribe was viewed as friendly to the colonists. When Powhatan sought to isolate and weaken the English by banning any of his subordinates from providing corn, the Accawmackes did not comply.

In the early 1620's, the Accawmacke chief, known to the English as "Laughing King" because he was so friendly, willingly gave a large tract to ensign Thomas Savage. Part of those 9,000 acres are still known as Savage Neck, named after the English immigrant rather than after the Native Americans.

Savage had emigrated to Virginia in 1608, and John Smith sent him to live with Powhatan in 1609. He fled Werowocomoco to shelter among the Potowomeke, and became a valued interpreter for both English and Algonquian-speaking tribes seeking to trade with each other. Savage became friends with the Occohannocks and Accawmackes on the Eastern Shore when he assisted in trading expeditions starting in 1621.

The Accawmacke "Laughing King" allowed the Virginia Company to occupy lands on the Eastern Shore, including a salt-making operation. In 1621, the Accawmackes refused to assist Powhatan’s brother, Opechancanough, in his plans for a violent uprising against the colonists. Opechancanough was unable to convince them to supply a poison that could be made from the water hemlock plant, which was abundant on the Eastern Shore. Because of the Accawmacke’s resistance to follow the directions of the Powhatan Chief, many Western Shore colonial settlers’ lives were saved.

The Accawmackes were allowed to sell lands to the English without special approval from the General Assembly. To protect the core of the Accawmacke territory and maintain the capacity of the tribe to supply furs and food to the English, the colony established a 1,500-acre Gingaskin reservation in Northampton County in 1640. By that time, the Accawmacke s were called the Gingaskins.

The tribe used the county courts to sue Englishmen who were occupying lands that were supposedly reserved, but encroachment by colonists was so successful that a 650-acre tract finally was surveyed to mark the boundaries of the remainder of the reservation. A patent for that land was issued in 1680, formalizing ownership according to English law.

In 1792, the General Assembly mandated that the Northampton County court appoint trustees to manage the reservation and to deal with disputes over land leased to local farmers. The trustees were white men, able to testify in the courts. When they performed their duty, the trustees could limit the ability of land-hungry colonists to ignore the boundaries and start using Gingaskin territory without legal authority. Trustees could also limit the ability of Gingaskins, especially werowances, to sell community-owned land. Nevertheless, tribal identity and population diminished to the point that no Gingaskin werowances or council members are documented after the 1660's.

The willingness of the General Assembly to help the tribe hold onto their land changed by the 1800's. The Native Americans had intermarried with free blacks rather than colonists. The whites on the Eastern Shore considered the Gingaskins to be more "mulatto," a slang term for mixed race, than "Indian." The men continued their Native American pattern of hunting and fishing, while their tax-exempt reservation lands were leased to local farmers.

Local whites feared that the reservation was becoming a reservoir of free blacks that posed a threat to the white community. As Native Americans, the Gingaskins were able to carry guns on their reservation. Slaves and free blacks in the community were not allowed to be armed. Just before the start of the War of 1812, a rumor of a slave revolt frightened whites on the Eastern Shore. The Shore was isolated by the Chesapeake Bay, and if a slave uprising occurred, the whites would have a hard time getting reinforcements.

After one of the Gingaskins was convicted of subversive behavior, the reservation's trustees tried to convince the Ginkaskins to terminate their protected--and tax-exempt-- status and be classified as "free negroes." The Gingaskins did manage to block proposals to sell the entire reservation and give money to each member of the tribe. Despite their efforts, this was the first instance of termination or legal allotment of reservation lands and detribalization of its owners in United States history.

In the end, the trustees petitioned the General Assembly for allotment of reservation lands to individual owners, and allowing the individual owners to sell whenever they wished. The legislature quickly authorized distribution of community-owned lands at the Gingaskin Reservation in 1813. Each of the 27 remaining adults on the reservation received about 25 acres, with the right to sell that land. The Gingaskins were in no hurry to sell and leave, however. Only 1/3 of the total land was sold in the next 15 years, and 3/4 of the Gingaskin who received allotments of land held onto their property.

The Nat Turner insurrection in 1831 in Southampton County frightened whites on the Eastern Shore, and a surge of land purchases by whites displaced many of the Gingaskins. Many continued to live in the area, but the once-compact community centered on the reservation lands was broken up after 1831. Today, the former reservation consists of farmed fields, patches of woodlands, and the Indiantown Recreation Park.


Indiantown Park path

A path meanders through the woods at Indiantown Park.
Photo credit: Jean E Flynn

Below is an excerpt from the Landmarks Trail:

 

Stop 2. Laws and Property Ownership: The Gingaskin Reservation and Indiantown



Location: Indiantown Park, 7399 Indiantown Rd., Eastville

“In 1641, the Accomac Indians, an Algonquin-speaking tribe located on the Eastern shore and part of the group collectively referred to as Powhatan Confederacy, became known as the Gingaskins when they accepted a patent from the English government for the remaining 1,500 acres of their ancestral lands in Northampton County. Various legal and boundary struggles with their English neighbors over the years reduced the lands reserved for the Gingaskins to 650 acres, which was patented again in 1680.

Over the years, Indian lands were often leased to outsiders by the state and county governments in order to help support Gingaskin members, most of whom chose to maintain a traditional lifestyle and not farm the lands in the English manner. Great concern was exhibited by White neighbors about the Gingaskins intermarrying with free Negroes and charges were made in petitions to the General Assembly in 1784 and 1787 that there were no more “real” Indians left on the Reservation and therefore the land should be given to Whites who could better protect it, by which they meant farm it in the traditional English way.”

Source: The UncommonWealth,

Gingaskin Petition to Northampton County
Source: Petition, November 26, 1784: Land Appropriated to the Tribe of the Gingaskin Indians, Northampton County. Northampton County Clerk of Court, Frances B. Latimer Collection, ESVA Heritage Center: Parksley, VA.

Starting in 1792, the General Assembly mandated that the Northampton County court appoint trustees to oversee the Gingaskin reservation, manage its land, and resolve disputes. However, these trustees were largely indifferent to their responsibilities and ultimately pressured—or outright compelled—the remaining Gingaskin members to agree to a division of the land in 1812. The following year, the General Assembly enacted legislation dissolving the reservation, officially partitioning the land among its recognized members, and granting individual ownership just as with any other Virginian property. This marked the first recorded instance in U.S. history of reservation land termination, legal allotment, and the systematic detribalization of its owners. While three-fourths of Gingaskin individuals initially retained their land, most were forcibly displaced in 1831 after the Nat Turner insurrection.

“Many of the Gingaskins, particularly women, married free people of African descent. After the Virginia legislature granted a Northampton petition to “levy a special tax that would fund the expulsion of all Free Negroes from the county by their forced migration to Liberia,” many free men and women left for places like Baltimore, Philadelphia, and New York. Census figures show a decline in the number of “Free Negroes” from 1,333 in 1830 to only 754 in 1840, a nearly 50% reduction. There was an overall population decline across all races, but the number of “Free Negroes” decline never rebounded.” Source: Mariner, p. 176-177.

Over time, the Gingaskin Reservation area became known as “Indiantown.” Many families in the area claim Gingaskin heritage. Into the 20th century, their racial identity was the subject of increasing marginalization and discrimination.

“Racial integrity laws were passed by the General Assembly to protect “Whiteness” against what many Virginians perceived to be the negative effects of race-mixing. They included the Racial Integrity Act of 1924, which prohibited interracial marriage and defined as White a person “who has no trace whatsoever of any blood other than Caucasian”; the Public Assemblages Act of 1926, which required all public meeting spaces to be strictly segregated; and a third act, passed in 1930, that defined as “Black” a person who has even a trace of African American ancestry. This way of defining Whiteness as a kind of purity in bloodline became known as the “one drop rule.” These laws arrived at a time when a pseudo-science of White superiority called eugenics gained support by groups like the Anglo-Saxon Clubs of America, which argued that the mixing of Whites, African Americans, and Virginia Indians could cause great societal harm, despite the fact that the races had been intermixing since European settlement.

The Racial Integrity Act remained on the books until 1967, when the U.S. Supreme Court, in Loving v. Virginia, found its prohibition of interracial marriage to be unconstitutional. In 2001, the General Assembly denounced the act, and eugenics, as racist.” Source: Encyclopedia Virginia.

**To learn more about the first inhabitants of Northampton County, read Helen C. Rountree and Thomas E. Davidson’s 1997 book, Eastern Shore Indians of Virginia and Maryland.**